LEGISLATIVE SCORECARDS AND GRADES

SUMMARY –
This is the Maryland Legislative Coalition’s seventh year of producing scorecards and grades for all of our legislators for the session.  This year, as with previous years, we are presenting the scorecard with 3 components:
· Grades Based on Voting Record
· Committee Efficiency
· Individual Initiative

We have done this to provide objective information on the behaviors that we believe constituents are interested in – how their representatives vote, what their committees get done and how active they are in sponsoring and leading the passage of legislation in accordance with our values.

Grades –
This year, only floor votes were scored.  All grades shown are based on the votes each legislator made unless they were not in the chamber at the time of the vote.  Normally, this means they were called out of the chamber to confer on another bill.

Committee Efficiency –
Committees were scored in terms of their rate of voting on bills, using our 281 priority bills, and each legislator was given the grade corresponding to the committee they were on. Some committees only voted on 41% of the bills that they saw in committee, while others voted on 67%. Those are still dismal scores.  It is our hope that this will shine a light on the need for committees to function efficiently and effectively, particularly given the compressed schedule of the Maryland legislature.  Committee leaders are shown in bold on the Committee column.

Individual Initiative –
The individual initiative scores rate bills sponsored, as a subset of our 281 priority bills, by each legislator. Here we are attempting to draw attention to the individual leadership of legislators, beyond the work of the committee they were assigned to.

Together we hope that the grades, along with the individual initiative and the efficiency of the committee for each legislator, provides constituents with an objective and balanced view of the performance of each legislator.

The full scorecard with all the scoring for each bill can be found by clicking on Scorecard – 2024   or copying this link into your browser –

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10pYYOrv3T8piKpSaG8RmEc6IaT8Ng8Fb/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106867060002549724778&rtpof=true&sd=true

 

A summary for each committee is provided below to demonstrate how well each committee has done in passing our bills.

COMMITTEE NAME # Bills Received % of Bills Voted % of Bills Passed Committee Chair
HOUSE OF DELEGATES
Appropriations 12 67% 88% Ben Barnes
Economic Matters 29 52% 73% C. T. Wilson
Environment and Transportation 50 54% 81% Marc Korman
Health and Government Operations 23 57% 85% Joseline Pena-Melnyk
Judiciary 39 46% 78% Luke Clippinger
Rules and Executive Nominations N/A N/A Anne Healey
Ways and Means 33 39% 46% Vanessa Atterbeary
SENATE
Budget and Taxation 17 41% 71% Guy Guzzone
Education, Health and Environmental Affairs 64 48% 81% Brian Feldman
Finance 36 67% 96% Pamela Beidle
Judicial Proceedings 49 51% 80% Will Smith
Rules N/A N/A Shelly Hettleman

 

A summary of the final grades for each legislator can be found below. 

Elections Environment Gun Control Health Care Schools Criminal Justice Economic Justice Social Justice TOTAL GRADE COMMITEE % BILLS VOTED #BILLS   SPONSORED
HOUSE OF DELEGATES
Acevero, Gabriel A C A A C A A D B APP 67% 5
Adams, Christopher T. F F F F F F F F F ECM 52%
Addison, Jackie A A A A A A A A A E&T 54%
Allen, Nick A A A A A A A A A E&T 54%
Alston, Tiffany T.  A A F A A A B A A HGO 57% 2
Amprey, Marlon A A A A A A A A A ECM 52%
Anderton, Carl, Jr. F F F D F F F F F APP 67%
Arentz, Steven J. F F F F F F F F F ECM 52%
Arikan, Lauren F F F F F F F F F JUD 46%
Attar, Dalya A A A A A A B A A W&M 39% 1
Atterbeary, Vanessa E. A A A A A A A A A W&M 39% 1
Bagnall, Heather A A A A A A A A A HGO 57%
Baker, Terry F F F F F F F F F E&T 54%
Barnes, Ben A A A A A A A A A APP 67%
Bartlett, J. Sandy A A A A A A A A A JUD 46% 5
Bhandari, Harry A A A A A B A A A HGO 57% 1
Boafo, Adrian A A A A A A A A A ECM 52% 3
Bouchat, Christopher Eric F F F F F A F F F JUD 46%
Boyce, Regina A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 2
Buckel, Jason C. F F F F F F F F F W&M 39%
Cardin, Jon S A B A A A B B A A JUD 46%
Chang, Mark S. A A A A A A A A A APP 67%
Charkoudian, Lorig A A A A A A A A A ECM 52% 10
Chisholm, Brian F F F F F F F F F HGO 57%
Ciliberti, Barrie S. F F F F F F F F F E&T 54%
Clippinger, Luke A A A A A A A A A JUD 46%
Conaway, Frank M., Jr. A A A A A A A A A JUD 46%
Crosby, Brian M. A A F A F A B D B ECM 52% 2
Crutchfield, Charlotte A A A A A A A A A JUD 46%
Cullison, Bonnie A A A A A A A A A HGO 57% 4
Davis, Debra A A A A A A A A A E&T 54%
Ebersole, Eric A A A A A A A A A W&M 39%
Edelson, Mark A A A B A A A A A APP 67% 2
Embry, Elizabeth A A A A A A A A A JUD 46% 3
Fair, Kris A A A A A A A A A W&M 39% 3
Feldmark, Jessica A A A A A A A A A W&M 39% 1
Fennell, Diana M. A A A A A A A A A ECM 52% 1
Fisher, Mark N. F F F F F F F F F ECM 52%
Foley, Linda A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 2
Forbes, Cathi A A A A A A A A A APP 67%
Fraser-Hidalgo, David A A A A A A A A A ECM 52% 4
Ghrist, Jefferson L. F F F F F F F F F APP 67%
Grammer, Robin L., Jr. F F F F F F F F F JUD 46%
Griffith, Mike F F F F F F F F F W&M 39%
Grossman, Brooke A B A A C B A A A W&M 39%
Guyton, Michele A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 1
Guzzone, Pam A A A A A A A A A HGO 57%
Harris, Kevin A A A A A A A A A APP 67%
Harrison, Andrea Fletcher A A A A A A A A A ECM 52% 2
Hartman, Wayne A. F F F F F F F F F W&M 39%
Healey, Anne A A A B A A A A A E&T 54%
Henson, Shaneka A A A A A B A D A W&M 39%
Hill, Terri A A A A A A A A A HGO 57% 4
Hinebaugh, Jim F F F F F F F F F APP 67%
Holmes, Marvin E., Jr. A A A A A A A A A E&T 54%
Hornberger, Kevin B. F F F F F C F F F W&M 39%
Howard, Seth A. F F F F F F F F F ECM 52%
Hutchinson, Tom F F F F F F F F F HGO 57%
Ivey, Julian A A A A A A A A A APP 67% 2
Jackson, Carl A A A A A A B A A ECM 52% 1
Jacobs, Jay A. F F F F F F F F F E&T 54%
Johnson, Andre A A A A A A B A A ECM 52% 1
Johnson, Steve A A A A A A C A A HGO 57% 1
Jones, Dana A A A A A A A A A APP 67% 1
Jones, Adrienne A. A A A A A A A A A
Kaiser, Anne R. A A A A A A A A A HGO 57% 2
Kaufman, Aaron A A A A A A A A A JUD 46%
Kerr, Ken A A A A A A A A A HGO 57%
Kipke, Nicholaus R. F F F F F F F F F HGO 57%
Korman, Marc A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 2
Lehman, Mary A. A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 3
Lewis, Robbyn A A A A A A A A A HGO 57%
Lewis, Jazz A A A A A A A A A APP 67% 1
Long, Robert B. F F F F F F F F F W&M 39%
Long, Jeffrie A B A A A A A A A E&T 54%
Lopez, Lesley J A A A A A A A A A HGO 57% 1
Love, Sara A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 2
Mangione, Nino F F F F F F F F F APP 67%
Martinez, Ashanti A A A A A A A A A HGO 57% 2
McCaskill, Aletheia A D A B C F A A B APP 67%
McComas, Susan F F F F F F F F F APP 67%
Metzgar, Ric F F F F F F F F F APP 67%
Miller, April Fleming F F F F F F F F F W&M 39%
Mireku-North, Bernice A A A A A A A A A W&M 39% 4
Moon, David A A A A A A A A A JUD 46% 5
Morgan, Matthew F F F F F F F F F HGO 57%
Morgan, Todd F F F F F F F F F E&T 54%
Munoz, Rachel F F F F F F F F F JUD 46%
Nawrocki, Ryan F F F F F F F F F E&T 54%
Otto, Charles J. F F F F F F F F F E&T 54%
Palakovich-Carr, Julie A A A A A A A A A W&M 39% 4
Pasteur, Cheryl A A A A A A C A A JUD 46% 2
Patterson, Edith J. A A A A A A A A A W&M 39% 1
Pena-Melnyk, Joseline A. A A A A A A A A A HGO 57% 1
Phillips, Scott A A A A A A A A A JUD 46% 1
Pippy, Jesse T. F F F F F F F F F ECM 52%
Pruski, Andrew A A A A A A A A A ECM 52%
Qi, Lily A A A A A A A A A ECM 52% 3
Queen, Pam A A A C C A C A B ECM 52%
Reilly, Teresa E. F F F F F F F F F HGO 57%
Roberson, Kent A A A A A A A A A JUD 46%
Roberts, Denise D A F A A A B D A W&M 39%
Rogers, Mike A A A A A B A A A ECM 52%
Rose, April F F F F F D F F F ECM 52%
Rosenberg, Samuel I. A B A B A A A A A HGO 57% 2
Ruff, Malcolm A A A A A A A A A APP 67% 1
Ruth, Sheila A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 8
Sample-Hughes, Sheree D F F A F A A D D JUD 46%
Schmidt, Stuart D F F F F F D F F JUD 46%
Shetty, Emily A A A A A B B A A APP 67% 1
Simmons, Gary A A A A A A A A A JUD 46%
Simpson, Karen A A A A A A A A A JUD 46%
Smith, Stephanie A A A A A A A A A APP 67% 3
Solomon, Jared A A A A A A A A A APP 67% 3
Spiegel, Ryan A A A A A A A A A APP 67% 1
Stein, Dana A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 3
Stewart, Vaughn A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 6
Stonko, Joshua F F F F F F F F F APP 67%
Szeliga, Kathy F F F F F F F F F HGO 57%
Taveras, Deni A A F A A B B A A HGO 57% 1
Taylor, Kym A A A A A A A A A JUD 46%
Terrasa, Jen A A A A A A A A A E&T 54% 5
Toles, Karen A A A B A A A A A JUD 46%
Tomlinson, Chris F F F F F F F F F JUD 46% 1
Turner, Veronica A A A A A A A A A ECM 52%
Valderrama, Kriselda A A A A A A A A A ECM 52%
Valentine, William F F F F F F F F F JUD 46%
Vogel, Joe A B F A C A A D B W&M 39% 2
Watson, Courtney A A A A A A A A A APP 67%
Wells, Melissa A A F A C A B A A W&M 39% 2
White, Jennifer A A A A A A A A A HGO 57% 1
Wilkins, Jheanelle K. A A A A A A A A A W&M 39% 4
Williams, Nicole A A A A A A A A A JUD 46% 4
Wilson, C. T. A B F A A A A D A ECM 52% 2
Wivell, William J. F F F F F F F F F ECM 52%
Wims, Greg A A A A A A A A A W&M 39%
Wolek, Sarah A A A A A A A A A APP 67%
Woods, Jamila A A A A A A A A A HGO 57%
Wu, Chao A A A A A A A A A W&M 39%
Young, Caylin A A A A A A A A A W&M 39%
Ziegler, Natalie A A A A A A A A A E&T 54%
SENATE
Augustine, Malcom A A A A A A A A A EEE 48% 5
Bailey, Jack F F F F F D F F F B&T 41%
Beidle, Pamela A A A A A A A A A FIN 67% 1
Benson, Joanne C. A A A A A A A A A B&T 41% 1
Brooks, Ben A A A A A A A A A EEE 48% 7
Carozza, Mary Beth D F F F F F F F F EEE 48%
Carter, Jill A A A A A A A A A JPR 51% 8
Charles, Nick D A A A D B B A B JPR 51% 2
Corderman, Paul D F F F F D F F F B&T 41%
Elfreth, Sarah A A A A A A A A A B&T 41% 5
Ellis, Arthur A A A A A A B A A FIN 67% 3
Feldman, Brian J. A A A A A A A A A EEE 48% 2
Ferguson, Bill A A A A A A A A A
Folden, Bill D F F F F F F F F JPR 51%
Gallion, Jason F F F F F F F F F EEE 48%
Gile, Dawn A A A A A B A A A FIN 67% 5
Guzzone, Guy A A A A A A A A A B&T 41% 2
Hayes, Antonio D A C A A A A A A FIN 67% 2
Hershey, Stephen S., Jr. D F F F F F F F F FIN 67%
Hester, Katie A A A A A A A A A EEE 48% 6
Hettleman, Shelly A A A A A A A A A B&T 41% 6
Jackson, Michael A. A A A A A A B A A B&T 41% 1
James, Mary-Dulany A B F A A B D A B JPR 51%
Jennings, J. B. D F F F F F F F F B&T 41%
Kagan, Cheryl C. A A A A A A A A A EEE 48% 7
Kelly, Ariana B. A A A A A A A A A JPR 51% 5
King, Nancy J. A A A A A A A A A B&T 41% 1
Klausmeier, Katherine A B F D A D B A C FIN 67% 3
Kramer, Ben A A A A A A A A A FIN 67%
Lam, Clarence A A A A A A A A A FIN 67% 5
Mautz, Johnny F F F F F F F F F FIN 67%
McCray, Cory A A D A A A A A A B&T 41% 3
McKay, Michael D F F F F D F F F JPR 51%
Muse, Anthony A C A A A A B A A JPR 51% 2
Ready, Justin D F F F F F F F F FIN 67%
Rosapepe, Jim A A A A A A A A A B&T 41% 3
Salling, Johnny Ray A F F F F F F F F B&T 41%
Simonaire, Bryan W. D F F F F F F F F EEE 48%
Smith, William C., Jr. A A A A A A A A A JPR 51% 3
Sydnor, Charles E. A B A A A A A A A JPR 51% 6
Waldstreicher, Jeff A A A A A A A A A JPR 51% 6
Washington, Mary A A A A A A A A A EEE 48% 3
Washington, Alonzo A A F B F A C A B FIN 67% 4
Watson, Ron  A A F A A A A F A EEE 48% 1
West, Chris A F F F D B F F F JPR 51% 2
Young, Karen Lewis A A A A A A A A A EEE 48% 4
Zucker, Craig J. A A A A A A A A A B&T 41%