LEGISLATIVE SCORECARDS AND GRADES

SUMMARY –
This is the Maryland Legislative Coalition’s eighth year of producing scorecards and grades for all of our legislators for the session.  This year, as with previous years, we are presenting the scorecard with 3 components:
· Grades Based on Voting Record
· Committee Efficiency
· Individual Initiative

We have done this to provide objective information on the behaviors that we believe constituents are interested in – how their representatives vote, what their committees get done and how active they are in sponsoring and leading the passage of legislation in accordance with our values.

Grades –
This year, only floor votes were scored.  All grades shown are based on the votes each legislator made unless they were not in the chamber at the time of the vote.  Normally, this means they were called out of the chamber to confer on another bill.

Committee Efficiency –
Committees were scored in terms of their rate of voting on bills, using our 311 priority bills, and each legislator was given the grade corresponding to the committee they were on. Some committees only voted on 40% of the bills that they saw in committee, while others voted on 71%. Those are still dismal scores.  It is our hope that this will shine a light on the need for committees to function efficiently and effectively, particularly given the compressed schedule of the Maryland legislature.  Committee leaders are shown in bold on the Committee column.

Individual Initiative –
The individual initiative scores rate bills sponsored, as a subset of our 311 priority bills, by each legislator. Here we are attempting to draw attention to the individual leadership of legislators, beyond the work of the committee they were assigned to.

Together we hope that the grades, along with the individual initiative and the efficiency of the committee for each legislator, provides constituents with an objective and balanced view of the performance of each legislator.

The full scorecard with all the scoring for each bill can be found by clicking on Scorecard 2026   or copying this link into your browser –

Scorecard – 2026.xlsx – Google Sheets

A summary for each committee is provided below to demonstrate how well each committee has done in passing our bills.

 

COMMITTEE NAME # Bills Received % of Bills Voted % of Bills Passed Committee Chair
HOUSE        
  Appropriations 13 69% 56% Ben Barnes
  Economic Matters 22 64% 71% Kriselda Valderrama
  Environment and Transportation 33 52% 82% Marc Korman
  Government, Labor, and Elections 49 47% 57% Melissa Wells
  Health 40 58% 70% Health Bagnall
  Judiciary 70 43% 67% Sandy Bartlett
  Rules and Executive Nominations 2 50% 0% Anne Healey
  Ways and Means 13 62% 63% Jheanelle Wilkins
SENATE        
  Budget and Taxation 10 40% 100% Guy Guzzone
  Education, Health and Environmental Affairs 45 53% 88% Brian Feldman
  Finance 41 71% 79% Pamela Beidle
  Judicial Proceedings 52 60% 87% Will Smith
  Rules 0 N/A N/A Shelly Hettleman

 

Listed below are the grades for each legislator by category of bills, as well as their committee productivity and the number of bills they sponsored.

 

  Elections Environmt Gun Control Health Care Schools Immigration and Policing Economic Justice Criminal/ Social Justice TOTAL GRADE Committee Committee Productivity #Bills Sponsored
HOUSE                          
Acevero, Gabriel 39 D F F C C A B C C APP 69% 5
Adams, Christopher T. 37B F F F F F F F D F ECM 64%  
Addison, Jackie 45 B A F B A B A A B W&M 62% 3
Allen, Nick 8 A A A A A A A A A E&T 52%  
Alston, Tiffany T.  24 A A F B A C C B B HEA 58% 1
Amprey, Marlon 40 A A A A A A A A A ECM 64%  
Anderson, Kevin H. 38A F F F F F F F F F E&T 52%  
Arentz, Steven J. 36 F F F C F F F F F ECM 64%  
Arikan, Lauren 7B F F F F F F F D F JUD 43%  
Bagnall, Heather 33C A B A A A A A A A HEA 58% 3
Baker, Terry 1C F F F F F F F D F E&T 52%  
Barnes, Ben 21 A A A A A A A A A APP 69%  
Bartlett, J. Sandy 32 A A A A A A A A A JUD 43% 5
Beauchamp, Barry 38B F F F F F F F F F APP 69%  
Behler, Dylan 30A B A A A A A A A A E&T 52% 3
Bhandari, Harry 8 B A A A A A A A A ECM 64%  
Boafo, Adrian 23 B F F F F F C D F ECM 64% 2
Bouchat, Christopher Eric 5 F F F F F F F F F JUD 43%  
Boyce, Regina 43A A A A A A A A A A E&T 52%  
Buckel, Jason C. 1B F F F F F F F F F W&M 62%  
Cardin, Jon S 11B D A A A A A C A B JUD 43%  
Chang, Mark S. 32 A A A A A A A A A APP 69%  
Charkoudian, Lorig 20 A A A A A A A A A ECM 64% 8
Chisholm, Brian 31 F F F F F F F F F GLE 47%  
Ciliberti, Barrie S. 4 F F F F F F F F F GLE 47%  
Clippinger, Luke 46 A A A A A A A A A GLE 47% 1
Coley, Derrick 24 B A A A A B A A A W&M 62%  
Conaway, Frank M., Jr. 40 B A A A A F A A C JUD 43%  
Crosby, Brian M. 29B F D F F F F F F F ECM 64%  
Crutchfield, Charlotte 19 A A A A A A A A A GLE 47% 1
Cullison, Bonnie 19 A B F A A A A A A HEA 58% 4
Davis, Debra 28 A A F A A A B A A JUD 43%  
Ebersole, Eric 44A B A A A A B A A A W&M 62% 1
Edelson, Mark 46 A B F B A A A A A APP 69% 1
Embry, Elizabeth 43A A A A A A A A A A JUD 43% 5
Fair, Kris 3 B A A A A A A A A GLE 47% 7
Feldmark, Jessica 12A A A A A A B A A A W&M 62% 1
Fennell, Diana M. 47A A A A A A A A A A ECM 64%  
Fisher, Mark N. 27C F F F F F F F F F GLE 47%  
Foley, Linda 15 B A A A A A A A A E&T 52% 2
Forbes, Cathi 43B A A A A A A A A A APP 69% 1
Fraser-Hidalgo, David 15 A A A A A A A A A E&T 52% 1
Ghrist, Jefferson L. 36 F F F F F F F F F W&M 62%  
Grammer, Robin L., Jr. 6 F F F F F F F F F E&T 52%  
Griffith, Mike 35A F F F F F F F F F W&M 62%  
Guyton, Michele 42B A A A A A A A A A E&T 52% 2
Guzzone, Pam 13 B A A A A A A A A HEA 58% 1
Harrison, Andrea Fletcher 24 B B A A A A C A A APP 69%  
Hartman, Wayne A. 38C F F F F F F F F F W&M 62%  
Healey, Anne 22 A A A C A A A A A E&T 52%  
Hill, Terri 12A B A A A A B A A A HEA 58% 6
Hinebaugh, Jim 1A F F F F F F F F F APP 69%  
Holmes, Marvin E., Jr. 23 D B A A A A A A A E&T 52%  
Hornberger, Kevin B. 35B F F F F F F F C F W&M 62%  
Howard, Seth A. 30B F F F F F F F F F ECM 64%  
Hutchinson, Tom 37B F F F D F F F F F HEA 58%  
Ivey, Julian 47A B B A A A A A A A APP 69% 1
Jacobs, Jay A. 36 F F F F F F F F F E&T 52%  
Johnson, Andre 34A D A A A A A A A A ECM 64% 4
Johnson, Steve 34A F A F C A B F B C HEA 58% 1
Jones, Adrienne A. 10 N/A A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A A APP 69%  
Jones, Dana 30A A B A A A A B A A APP 69% 2
Kaiser, Anne R. 14 A A A A A A B A A APP 69%  
Kaufman, Aaron 18 A A A A A A A A A HEA 58%  
Kerr, Ken 3 B A F A A A A A A GLE 47%  
Kipke, Nicholaus R. 31 F F F F F F F F F HEA 58% 1
Korman, Marc 16 A A A A A A A A A E&T 52% 5
Lehman, Mary A. 21 B A F A A A A A A GLE 47% 2
Lewis, Robbyn 46 A A A A A A A A A E&T 52% 1
Long, Jeffrie 27B A B A A A A A A A E&T 52% 1
Long, Robert B. 6 F F F F F F F D F W&M 62%  
Lopez, Lesley J 39 A A A A A A A A A HEA 58% 6
Mangione, Nino 42A F F F F F F F F F JUD 43%  
Martinez, Ashanti 22 A A A A A A A A A HEA 58% 3
McCaskill, Aletheia 44B F B F A A A D B B APP 69%  
McComas, Susan 34B F F F F F F F D F JUD 43%  
Metzgar, Ric 6 F F F F F F F D F APP 69%  
Miller, April Fleming 4 F F F F F F F D F W&M 62% 1
Mireku-North, Bernice 14 A A A A A A A A A W&M 62% 4
Moon, David 20 A A A A A A A A A JUD 43% 2
Moreno, Gabriel M. 13 B B A A C A A A A JUD 43% 3
Morgan, Matthew 29A F F F F F F F F F HEA 58%  
Morgan, Todd 29C F F F F F F F F F E&T 52%  
Nawrocki, Ryan 7A F F F F F F F F F E&T 52%  
Nkongolo, LaToya 31 F F F F F F F F F JUD 43%  
Odom, Darrell 27A D A A A A A A A A E&T 52%  
Palakovich-Carr, Julie 17 A A A A A A A A A W&M 62% 4
Pasteur, Cheryl 11A A A A B A B A A A W&M 62% 1
Patterson, Edith J. 28 B A A B A B A A A W&M 62% 4
Pena-Melnyk, Joseline A. 21 A A A A A A A A A      
Phillips, Scott 10 B A A A C A A A A JUD 43%  
Pippy, Jesse T. 4 F F F D F F F D F ECM 64%  
Pruski, Andrew 33A A A A A A A A A A ECM 64%  
Qi, Lily 15 A B A A C A B A A ECM 64% 3
Queen, Pam 14 B A A A A A B A A ECM 64%  
Reilly, Teresa E. 35A F F F F F F F F F HEA 58%  
Roberson, Kent 25 B A F A A B A A B W&M 62%  
Roberts, Denise 25 D A F A A A A B A ECM 64%  
Rogers, Mike 32 B B A A A A B A A ECM 64%  
Rose, April 5 F F F F F F F F F ECM 64%  
Rosenberg, Samuel I. 41 B A A A A A A A A HEA 58% 5
Ross, Kim 8 A A A B A A A A A HEA 58%  
Ruff, Malcolm 41 A A A A A A A A A APP 69% 3
Ruth, Sheila 44B A A A B A A A A A GLE 47% 7
Sample-Hughes, Sheree 37A F F F A A B A B C GLE 47% 1
Schindler, Matthew 2B A B F A A A B A A GLE 47% 4
Schmidt, Stuart 33B F C F C F F F B F GLE 47% 1
Shetty, Emily 18 A A A A A A A A A APP 69% 1
Simmons, Gary 12B A A A A A A A A A JUD 43% 1
Simpson, Karen 3 A A A A A A A A A JUD 43%  
Smith, Stephanie 45 A A A A A A A A A APP 69% 4
Solomon, Jared 18 A A A A A A A A A GLE 47% 2
Spiegel, Ryan 17 A A A A A A A A A APP 69% 1
Stein, Dana 11B A A A A A A A A A E&T 52% 2
Stewart, Vaughn 19 A A A A A A A A A GLE 47% 6
Stinnett, Sean 41 A A A A A A A A A JUD 43% 2
Stonko, Joshua 42C F F F F F F F F F APP 69%  
Szeliga, Kathy 7A F F F F F F F F F HEA 58%  
Taveras, Deni 47B A B A A C A A A A HEA 58% 3
Taylor, Kym 23 B A A A A A A A A JUD 43% 1
Terrasa, Jen 13 A A A A A A A A A GLE 47% 4
Toles, Karen 25 B A A A A A A B A APP 69%  
Tomlinson, Chris 5 F F F D F F F F F GLE 47%  
Turner, Veronica 26 B A A A A A A A A ECM 64%  
Valderrama, Kriselda 26 B A A A A A A A A ECM 64%  
Valentine, William 2A F F F F F F F C F JUD 43%  
Vogel, Joe 17 A B A A A A A A A W&M 62% 9
Watson, Courtney 9B A A A A A A B A A APP 69%  
Wells, Melissa 40 B A A A C A A A A GLE 47% 1
White Holland, Jennifer 10 B C A A A D F A B HEA 58%  
Wilkins, Jheanelle K. 20 A A A A A B A A A W&M 62% 4
Williams, Nicole 22 F A A D F A F F C JUD 43% 4
Wilson, C. T. 28 F B F F F F F B F GLE 47% 2
Wims, Greg 39 B A F A C A A A A W&M 62% 1
Wivell, William J. 2A F F F F F F F F F ECM 64%  
Wolek, Sarah 16 A A A A A A A A A APP 69% 2
Woods, Jamila 26 A A A A A A A C A JUD 43% 2
Woorman, Teresa 16 A A A A A A A A A HEA 58% 3
Wu, Chao 9A A B A A A A B A A GLE 47% 1
Young, Caylin 45 B B A A C A C B B W&M 62%  
Ziegler, Natalie 9A A A A A A A A A A E&T 52%  
Senator                        
Attar, Dalya 41 A A A A A A A C A EEE 53% 1
Augustine, Malcom 47 C A A A A A A A A B&T 40% 3
Bailey, Jack 29 F F F F F F F D F B&T 40%  
Beidle, Pamela 32 C A A A A B A A A FIN 71% 2
Benson, Joanne C. 24 F A N/A A A A A A A B&T 40% 3
Brooks, Ben 10 A A A A A A A B A EEE 53% 7
Carozza, Mary Beth 38 F F F F F F F C F EEE 53%  
Charles, Nick 25 A B A B A B B A B JPR 60% 1
Corderman, Paul 2 F F F F F F F C F B&T 40%  
Ellis, Arthur 28 F F A F F F F F F FIN 71%  
Feldman, Brian J. 15 A B A A A A A A A EEE 53% 2
Ferguson, Bill 46 A A A A A A A A A     1
Folden, Bill 4 F F F D F F F F F JPR    
Gallion, Jason 35 F F F F F F F C F EEE 53%  
Gile, Dawn 33 A A A A A B B A A FIN 71% 3
Guzzone, Guy 13 C A A A A B A A A B&T 40% 1
Harris, Kevin M. 27 A A A A A A A A A EEE 53% 2
Hayes, Antonio 40 C A F B A B A B B FIN 71%  
Henson, Shaneka 30 C A F A A A A A A JPR 60% 6
Hershey, Stephen S., Jr. 36 F F F F F F F F F FIN 71%  
Hester, Katie 9 A A A A A A A A A EEE 53% 7
Hettleman, Shelly 11 C A A A A A A A A B&T 40% 6
Jackson, C. 8 A A F A A D A B A FIN 71%  
James, Mary-Dulany 34 C A A A F F F F D JPR 60%  
Jennings, J. B. 7 F F F F F F F C F B&T 40% 1
Kagan, Cheryl C. 17 A A A A A A A B A EEE 53% 5
King, Nancy J. 39 C A A A A A B A A B&T 40% 2
Kramer, Ben 19 A A A A A B B A A FIN 71% 4
Lam, Clarence 12 A A A A A A A A A FIN 71% 9
Love, Sara 16 C A A A A A B A A JPR 60% 12
Mautz, Johnny 37 F F F F F F F C F FIN 71%  
McCray, Cory 45 F B A A A A A B B B&T 40% 2
McKay, Michael 1 F D F F F F F D F JPR 60%  
Muse, Anthony 26 F F A F F F F F F JPR 60% 3
Ready, Justin 5 F F F F F F F C F FIN 71%  
Rosapepe, Jim 21 C A A B A A B D B B&T 40% 1
Salling, Johnny Ray 6 F F F F F F F C F B&T 40%  
Simonaire, Bryan W. 31 F F F F F F F C F EEE 53%  
Smith, William C., Jr. 20 A A A A A A A A A JPR 60% 7
Sydnor, Charles E. 44 A A A A A A A A A JPR 60% 5
Waldstreicher, Jeff 18 A A A B A A A B A JPR 60% 8
Washington, Mary 43 A A A A A A A A A EEE 53% 3
Washington, Alonzo 22 C D A B A B A A B FIN 71% 3
Watson, Ron  23 A D F B A B A B B EEE 53%  
West, Chris 42 F D F D F F F D F JPR 60%  
Young, Karen Lewis 3 A A A A A A A A A B&T 40% 3
Zucker, Craig J. 14 C A A A A A A A A B&T 40%